Diplomatic Leadership (2024)

Diplomatic Leadership in Times of International Crisis: The Maverick, the Congregator and the Pragmatist

Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2015

The objective of this forum section is to provide a framework for intellectual exchange and debate about the role of diplomacy in negotiating global crises and the latter's impact on the evolution of diplomatic leadership, identity and method. Drawing on theories of leadership, decision-making, power and crisis management, the contributions to this forum do not claim to provide definitive answers to these questions but they invite readers to reflect upon the analytical implications of theorizing crisis diplomacy.

Exploring Diplomatic Option in Practicing Essential Skills for Management - CIPDM Lag June

Academic.edu, 2023

The leaders and managers can cultivate a harmonious work environment and achieve sustainable results by incorporating diplomacy in their standard management practices. Diplomacy is not mere an advantage that a firm or management can have over its component, it's an essential component of workplace stability and discipline. Diplomacy makes life easier for the top-level management as it is very often that it finds itself in a situation where tough and unpopular decisions have to made. The decisions can be made without harsh tradeoffs with a touch of diplomatic strategy.

Review – Leadership

E-International Relations, 2024

Leaders do not ignore reality but challenge it. The book is a history, a guide for leaders, and a comparative foreign policy analysis opening the black box of foreign policy decision-making. Kissinger looks at some of the same events focusing on the perspectives of different leaders. Leadership can interest a wide audience beyond those interested in international relations as a lesson in how to lead and prod the possible with a sense of civic duty and learned thoughtfulness. The leaders analyzed are notable in the diversity of strategies they deployed, styles they brought with them, and political realities that confronted them. The lesson is to dare greatly, but not too much. This may sound unsatisfying, but that is the point. Leadership is difficult. The world’s wicked problems are complex. While there are no easy answers, a deeper, considered approach to what was and can be will bring us to the edge of the possible and realize a nation’s potential.

Leadership and Communication

Contributions to Management Science, 2014

The Art of Leadership – An Understanding

Journal of human resource and leadership, 2022

SECRETS OF EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP

DIPLOMACY UNDER POLITICAL LEADERSHIP COMPARED TO MILITARY LEADERSHIP

Feschrift, 2018

Diplomatic relations is sustained in political leadership considering the principles that uphold democratic leadership; this is not usually so in military leadership. No wonder the saying that the worst political leadership is better than the best military leadership. Whereas political leadership upholds global democratic practices which reflects in domestic policies and external policies and as such strengthens diplomatic relations between the state and the international system; the military leadership with its characteristic autocratic and dictatorial style of leadership do not promote healthy and stable domestic environment and external policies and thus operates in isolation to other actors within the international system. In cases where military leadership formulates policies which are beneficial to the populace, such policies whether domestic or external are not sustained considering the autocratic nature of military leadership. The continuous abuse of democratic tenets have at various times constrained diplomatic; while also in various military leadership there have been high points of diplomatic relation though still not reconcilable with what should be obtainable in a democratic leadership.

Leadership: Past, Present, and Future

L eadership matters, according to prominent leadership scholars (see also Bennis, 2007). But what is leadership? That turns out to be a challenging question to answer. Leadership is a complex and diverse topic, and trying to make sense of leadership research can be an intimidating endeavor. One comprehensive handbook of leadership (Bass, 2008), covering more than a century of scientific study, comprises more than 1,200 pages of text and more than 200 additional pages of references! There is clearly a substantial scholarly body of leadership theory and research that continues to grow each year. Given the sheer volume of leadership scholarship that is available, our purpose is not to try to review it all. That is why our focus is on the nature or essence of leadership as we and our chapter authors see it. But to fully understand and appreciate the nature of leadership, it is essential that readers have some background knowledge of the history of leadership research, the various theoretical streams that have evolved over the years, and emerging issues that are pushing the boundaries of the leadership frontier. Further complicating our task is that more than one hundred years of leadership research have led to several paradigm shifts and a voluminous body of knowledge. On several occasions, scholars of leadership became quite frustrated by the large amount of false starts, incremental theoretical advances, and contradictory findings. As stated more than five decades ago by Warren Bennis (1959, pp. 259–260), " Of all the hazy and confounding areas in social psychology, leadership theory undoubtedly contends for

LEADERSHIP

Global Leadership